Boomerang’s streaming service has 150,000 subscribers; 2017 was a down year for animation cable channel ratings

A year ago, Turner and Warner Bros. announced that they were launching a new streaming service for Boomerang, the sister channel to Cartoon Network that specializes in airing older material (the Hanna-Barbera library, “Tom and Jerry,” older Cartoon Network shows, and Looney Tunes). The streaming service was designed as one way to boost Boomerang’s visibility as an outlet, as well as get in on the streaming craze.

Did it work? Apparently so. According to TechCrunch, Turner executive John Martin reports that Boomerang now has roughly 150,000 subscribers. The same article also states Turner considers Turner Classic Movies’ FilmStruck service a success.

It’s a good thing that Boomerang’s considered a successful effort. But how does it compare to its cable TV channel counterpart, as well as rival animation-related cable channels?

Ratings

BoomerangIndieWire reported on the viewership for various cable channels in 2017, as well as how much it’s grown or shrunk from 2016. Looking at the animation-related channels:

  • Boomerang: 138,000 (-26%)
  • Cartoon Network: 846,000 (-13%)
  • Disney Channel: 1.023 million (-24%)
  • Universal Kids (formerly Sprout): 117,000 (-30%)
  • Disney XD: 205,000 (-30%)
  • Disney Junior: 545,000 (-11%)
  • Nickelodeon: 1.314 million (0%)
  • Nick Jr.: 639,000 (+4%)
  • TeenNick: 145,000 (-21%)
  • Discovery Family: 118,000 (-20%)

Yikes. Nick’s flat, and both Cartoon Network and Disney Channel are down. Boomerang, meanwhile, is down by 26%, which is pointed out in the IndieWire article itself. If all of these figures are accurate, apparently Boomerang now has more paying subscribers than numbers of viewers tuning in through cable. Again, Boomerang isn’t really carried by Comcast, which hurts its penetration levels.

While there’s nothing mentioned in the article on why the ratings are down across the board, I’m assuming the ongoing switch to streaming is to blame, at least in part. In Sprout/Universal Kids’ case, I wonder if the less-familiar name didn’t help with the network’s changeover.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *